Next: Accommodating the dialogue plan
Up: Accommodation
Previous: Accommodation
Dialogue participants can address questions that have not been
explicitly raised in the dialogue. However, it is important that a
question be available to the agent who is to interpret it because the
utterance may be elliptical. Here is an example from our dialogue:
$J: vicken månad ska du åka
( what month do you want to go )
$P: ja: typ den: ä: tredje fjärde april /
nån gång där
( well around 3rd 4th april / some time there )
$P: så billit som möjlit
( as cheap as possible )
The strategy we adopt for interpreting elliptical utterances is to
think of them as short answers (in the sense of Ginzburg [Ginzburg1998]) to questions on QUD. A suitable question here is What kind
of price does P want for the ticket?. This question is not under
discussion at the point when P says ``as cheap as possible''. But
it can be figured out since J knows that this is a relevant
question. In fact it will be a question which J has as an action in
his plan to raise. On our analysis it is this fact which enables A
to interpret the ellipsis. He finds the matching question on his
plan, accommodates by placing it on QUD and then continues with the
integration of the information expressed by as cheap as
possible as normal. Note that if such a question is not
available then the ellipsis cannot be interpreted as in the dialogue
in (7).
A. What time are you coming to pick up Maria?
B. Around 6 p.m. As cheap as possible.
This dialogue is incoherent if what is being discussed is when the
child Maria is going to be picked up from her friend's house (at least
under standard dialogue plans that we might have for such a conversation).
Next: Accommodating the dialogue plan
Up: Accommodation
Previous: Accommodation
Staffan Larsson
10/11/1999