<div dir="ltr">Could you post the result of running pocolog on your test logfiles ? Last time I looked, low-level access in pocolog was *not* the performance hog, the stream aligner was (which -- I guess -- means there is a bug somewhere). I'd like to verify that.<div>
<br></div><div>Sylvain</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Sylvain Joyeux <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bir.sylvain@gmail.com" target="_blank">bir.sylvain@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="">On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Janosch Machowinski <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Janosch.Machowinski@dfki.de" target="_blank">Janosch.Machowinski@dfki.de</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Anyway, giving out unpacked types, seems not to work,<br>
as one needs the RTT typesystem for unpacking (if I<br>
understood the code right...)<br>
How would I create a packed typelib::Value on the C++<br>
side ?</blockquote></div><div>What do you call "packed" and "unpacked" there ? /me very confused</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>Sylvain</div></font></span></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>